Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 186 Okla. 249 - Croxton v. State

Croxton v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1939

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
2
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably Bernstein v. Smutz (1947), Palmer Oil Corp. v. Phillips Petroleum Co. (1951)

1 federal appellate · 29 state decisions

180193919401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Champlin Refining Co. v. Corporation Commission · Brown v. Humble Oil & Refining Co. · Lombardo v. City of Dallas · Patterson v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. · Shaw v. Grumbine

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““‘All property is held subject to the valid exercise of the police power; nor are regulations unconstitutional merely because they operate as a restraint upon private rights of person or property or will result in loss to individuals. The infliction of such loss is not a deprivation of property without due process of law; the exertion of police power upon subjects lying within its scope, in a proper and lawful manner, is due process of law.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Police regulations which are reasonable are not inhibited by the Constitution, though invading its letter, since the exercise of police power is so essential to the public welfare that it is presumed that such exercise within reasonable limits was not intended to be prohibited, but, on the contrary, guaranteed by the general declared purpose of civil government and the manifest purpose of the Constitution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.