McDaniels v. Laub’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Wittmer v. Peters · Benton v. Adams · Jones v. Menard · Graven v. Vail Associates, Inc. · Conrad v. Imatani
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Summary judgment is appropriate if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“When a motion for summary judgment is submitted and supported by affidavit, the party opposing ... summary judgment cannot rely on the mere allegations [in the] pleadings, but must, by affidavit or otherwise as provided by C.R.C.P. 56, set forth specific facts showing a genuine issue of material fact.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“to comply with C.R.C.P. 56(f) by filing an affidavit explaining why [he was] unable to obtain an affidavit ... in a timely manner.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.