Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

186 So. 2d 257

Tillman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1966-05-04

Relies on Wallace v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1966-05-04

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently May 1990

3 state decisions

101966197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Appellant, defendant below, appeals an order denying his motion to vacate judgment and sentence filed pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix. Appellant’s motion failed to allege that he was indigent and unable to employ counsel at the time he entered his plea. The motion was therefore legally insufficient. Hoffman v. State, 163 So.2d 797 (D.C.A.Fla.1964), and cases cited therein.

¶2The order appealed is therefore affirmed without prejudice to appellant’s right to refile his motion.

¶3Affirmed.

LILES, Acting C. J., and HOBSON and PIERCE, JJ., concur.
/186/so2d/257 · .json · Public domain