186 So. 2d 747 - Thompson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “No product of any search of appellant's premises was introduced in evidence, so there is no issue of an illegal search and seizure. Appellant's counsel did not develop this point at the trial, made no motion for production of an affidavit and search warrant, and thus no issue exists as to whether an illegal search and seizure was used to extract the confession. 186 So.2d at 747-748 . (Emphasis added.)”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Thompson v. State

2. “On cross-examination the sheriff said that his deputy made the arrest, and he was sure he had a warrant for her arrest. 186 So.2d at 747 . (Emphasis added.)”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Thompson v. State