Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 186 SO2D 855 - Beatty v. Beatty

Beatty v. Beatty’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
March 2009
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 2009

5 state decisions

2019661970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Peyton v. Roth · Agricultural Supply Co. v. Lavigne

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In all cases where the thing sold remains in the possession of the seller, because he has reserved to himself the usufruct, or retains possession by precarious title, there is reason to presume that the sale is simulated, and with respect to third persons, the parties must produce proof that they are acting in good faith, and establish the reality of the sale.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.