¶1After careful consideration of the briefs, an examination of the record, including a thorough reading of the depositions of appellant’s witnesses which appellant alleged the trial court had failed to read, and a review of the applicable law, we conclude that appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error. The decree entered by the court below is therefore affirmed.
186 So. 2d 93
Nunn v. Nunn
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 11, 1966
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1966-05-11
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 1987
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1966-05-11
View the full empirical analysis of this case →