186 So. 3d 728 - State v. Lambert’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Crawford v. Washington · McDonald v. City of Chicago · Apodaca v. Oregon · 523 So. 2d 1305 - State v. Mussall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Ojur present jurisprudence provides that non-unanimous verdicts in noncapi-tal felony cases do not violate the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments. Defendant makes no persuasive argument that non-unanimous verdicts in noncapital felony cases calling for mandatory life sentences without parole upon conviction call for a different result. Apodaca v. Oregon, 406 U.S. 404 , 92 S.Ct. 1628 , 32 L.Ed.2d 184 (1972); McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 U.S. 742 , 130 S.Ct. 3020 , 177 L.Ed.2d 894 (2010)(recognizing Apo-daca ’s continuing viability); State v. Bertrand, 2008-2215 (La.3/17/09), 6 So.3d 738 ; State v. Curtis, 2011-1676 (La.App. 4 Cir. 3/13/13) , 112 So.3d 323 . Accordingly, this assignment of error is without merit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“within the sound discretion of the trier of fact and will not be disturbed unless clearly contrary to the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Carter
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.