Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

186 S.W.3d 482

Mayo v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 21, 2006

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2006-03-21

Decided 2006-03-21

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Movant, Michael Mayo, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions -of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

¶3*483We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

/186/sw3d/482 · .json · Public domain