Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

186 S.W.3d 827

Williams v. ROM Corp.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 14, 2006

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2006-02-14

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 2011

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-02-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Appellant Eugene Williams appeals from an order issued by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying his application for unemployment benefits pursuant to § 288.050 based upon a finding that he had left his employment with ROM Corporation voluntarily and without good cause attributable to his work or his employer. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the Commission’s order is supported by sufficient competent evidence in the record, that the Commission acted within its powers, that the decision was not procured by fraud, and that the facts found by the Commission support the award. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

¶3Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

/186/sw3d/827 · .json · Public domain