Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 186 TENN 631 - Alamo Development Corp. v. Thomas

Alamo Development Corp. v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently September 2016 · most notably Bowden v. Ward (2000), In Re: Estate of Martha M. Tanner (2009)

21 state decisions

8019481950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sohn v. Waterson · Hathaway v. Merchants' Loan & Trust Co. · Cavender v. Hewitt · Commerce Union Bank v. Gillespie · Milbourne v. Kelley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[The state] may change the common law and the statutes so as to create duties and liabilities which never existed before.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.