Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 186 U.S. 181 - Hanover National Bank v. Moyses

Hanover National Bank v. Moyses’s Empirical Analysis

186 U.S. 181 · 1902

Citation profile

941
cited by 941 later decisions
63
cited 63 times by the Supreme Court
17
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

183 federal appellate · 82 district · 45 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 941 later decisions (63 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2022 · most notably Local Loan Co. v. Hunt (1934), Blanchette v. Connecticut General Insurance Corporations (1974)

183 federal appellate · 82 district · 45 state decisions — followed in 17 states

24701902191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sturges v. Crowninshield · In re Rahrer · Denny v. Bennett · New Lamp Chimney Company v. Ansonia Brass and Copper Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 941 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he general operation of the [exemption] law is uniform although it may result in certain particulars differently in different states”
    15 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““I hold, it extends to all cases where the law causes to be distributed the property of the debtor among his creditors; this is its least limit. Its greatest is the discharge of a debtor from his contracts. And all intermediate legislation, affecting substance and form tending to further the great end of the subject, distribution and discharge are in the competency and discretion of Congress. With the policy of a law letting in all classes,-others as well as trans- and permitting the bankrupt to^come m voluntanly, and be discharged without the consent of his editors, the courts have no concern; it belongs to the lawmakers.””
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.