Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 186 VA 55 - Dawkins v. Commonwealth

Dawkins v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1947

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
3
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

47 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently December 2017 · most notably 8 Va. App. 194 - Long v. Commonwealth (1989), 12 Va. App. 476 - Campbell v. Commonwealth (1991)

47 state decisions

18019471950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Merritt v. Commonwealth · Roark v. Commonwealth · Shackelford v. Commonwealth · Johnson v. Commonwealth · Harris v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Malice inheres in the doing of a wrongful act intentionally, or without just cause or excuse, or as a result of ill will. It may be directly evidenced by words, or inferred from acts and conduct which necessarily result in injury.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The test of the offense of maliciously or unlawfully causing bodily injury is the intent with which the result is accomplished rather than the nature of the means, where the means are specified and established. Thus, one may permanently maim, disfigure, disable or kill with the fists, or knees, if the force is applied with violence and brutality.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.