Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 186 VA 616 - Gary v. Artist

Gary v. Artist’s Empirical Analysis

1947

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 1983
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 1983

4 state decisions

1019471950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Neal v. Spencer · Orndorff v. Howell · Norfolk Railway & Light Co. v. Higgins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Instruction E is erroneous because, among other things wrong, it virtually told the jury that Edwards could pass on the right of the automobile in front of him without having the statutory signal given him. Of course, this is in derogation of the term of the statute under the existent circumstances and cannot be permitted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “stopped or slowed up to make a left turn and then made a right turn.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.