Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1936-06-13
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 1970
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
¶1
(dissenting) — In my opinion, the Cedar Brae property became respondent’s separate estate by the original deed from her husband. The record does not contradict that status. The cases cited are not to the contrary.
¶2
The judgment should be affirmed entirely. I therefore dissent.
¶3
Millard, C. J., and Tolman, J., concur with Holcomb, J.