186 Wis. 2d 1 - State v. Goetsch’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently April 2023
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Wong Sun v. United States · Florida v. Royer · Michigan v. Mosley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Id. at 7 . We concluded that this statement was an invocation of Goetsch's right to remain silent. We also noted in a footnote that: We need not decide whether, upon an equivocal assertion of a suspect's right to silence, interrogation must cease. In this case we conclude that any ambiguity in Goetsch's invocation of his right to silence was resolved when the entire interrogation is considered. Id. at 8 n.2. The State asserts that”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“I don't want to talk about this any more. I've told you, I've told you everything I can tell you. You just ask me any questions and I just want to get out of here. Throw me in jail, I don't want to think about this.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“could not reasonably have contributed to [Goetsch's] conviction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.