Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 186 W. Va. 113 - McGraw v. McGraw

186 W. Va. 113 - McGraw v. McGraw’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
6
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently April 2019

20 state decisions

100199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 45 U.S.C. § 231B (Railroad Retirement Act of 1974) · 45 U.S.C. § 231M (Railroad Retirement Act of 1974)

Relies on Hisquierdo v. Hisquierdo · 160 W. Va. 514 - Nichols v. Nichols · Eichelberger v. Eichelberger · 172 W. Va. 158 - LaRue v. LaRue · 183 W. Va. 451 - Whiting v. Whiting

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This section shall not operate to prohibit the characterization or treatment of that portion of an annuity under this subchapter which is not computed under section 231b(a), 231c(a) or 231c(f) of this title, or any portion of a supplemental annuity under this subchapter, as community property for the purposes of, or property subject to, distribution in accordance with a court decree of divorce, annulment, or legal separation or the terms of any court-approved property settlement incident to any such court decree.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The Railroad Retirement Act of 1974, 45 U.S.C. Sec. 231m, expressly precludes from consideration as divisible marital property the basic railroad retirement annuity, which provides benefits equivalent to benefits under the Social Security Act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.