Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 186 W. Va. 214 - Howe v. Thompson

186 W. Va. 214 - Howe v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 2019

6 state decisions

20199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 163 W. Va. 332 - Bradley v. Appalachian Power Co. · 176 W. Va. 492 - Roberts v. Stevens Clinic Hospital, Inc. · 151 W. Va. 158 - Morgan v. Price · 160 W. Va. 129 - King v. Bittinger · 164 W. Va. 400 - Royal Furniture Co. v. City of Morgantown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““‘It is not error to refuse to give an instruction to the jury, though it states a correct and applicable principle of law, if the principle stated in the instruction refused is adequately covered by another instruction or other instructions given.’ Syl. Pt. 3, Morgan v. Price, 151 W.Va. 158 , 150 S.E.2d 897 (1966).” Syllabus point 3, Roberts v. Stevens Clinic Hosp., Inc., 176 W.Va. 492 , 345 S.E.2d 791 (1986).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “instruction had no effect on the outcome of this case because the jury found that the Respondents were not liable for the infant's injuries. 15 After reviewing the jury instructions as a whole, we do not find error in excluding the proposed jury instruction. As the circuit court correctly found, the jury was fully instructed on all principles applicable to this matter, and the omission of the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.