Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 186 W. Va. 693 - Farley v. Buckalew

186 W. Va. 693 - Farley v. Buckalew’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

143
cited by 143 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

143 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 143 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably 196 W. Va. 535 - Banker v. Banker (1996), 204 W. Va. 525 - State Ex Rel. ACF Industries, Inc. v. Vieweg (1999)

143 state decisions

680199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 159 W. Va. 108 - Smith v. State Workmen's Compensation Commissioner · 143 W. Va. 674 - Daurelle v. Traders Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n · 126 W. Va. 858 - Laundry Co. v. Dunn Hospital · 179 W. Va. 183 - Matter of Vandelinde · 182 W. Va. 722 - Application of Metheney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 143 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] statute that is ambiguous must be construed before it can be applied.”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he primary object in construing a statute is to ascertain and give effect to the intent of the Legislature.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““ ‘Statutes which relate to the same subject matter should be read and applied together so that the Legislature’s intention can be gathered from the whole of the enactments.’ Syllabus Point 3, Smith v. State Workmen’s Compensation Commissioner, 159 W.Va. 108 , 219 S.E.2d 361 (1975).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.