Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 187 A3D 107 - State v. Bailey P. Serpa

State v. Bailey P. Serpa’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Harmelin v. Michigan · Miller v. Alabama · Miller v. Alabama · State v. Ball · Doe v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No person shall knowingly utilize a computer on-line service, internet service, or local bulletin board service to seduce, solicit, lure, or entice a child or another person believed by the person to be a child, to commit any of the following: (a) Any offense under RSA 632-A, relative to sexual assault and related offenses.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.