People v. Jiminez’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 32 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently February 2001 · most notably United States v. Heldt (1981), Sinclair v. State (1976)
2 federal appellate · 32 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hampton v. People · Ferguson v. Hurford · Meader v. People · People V. · People v. (Attorneys Respondent)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A defendant will not be permitted, as a matter of trial strategy, to conceal error during trial ... and upon an adverse result assert as grounds for reversal the error he should have revealed to the court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Witty
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.