Thibodo v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
187 F.2d 249 · 1951
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1996
4 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act)
Relies on Bell v. Hood · Bauman v. Ross · Jacobs v. United States · United States v. Great Falls Manuf'G Co · Phelps v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Both of the above doors to recovery on his bonds were closed to the plaintiff when the United States exercised its power over the land in 1943. Mullen Benevolent Corp. v. United States, [ 290 U.S. 89 , 54 S.Ct. 38 , 78 L.Ed. 192 ] supra.” 11”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“make such orders in respect of encumbrances, liens, rents, taxes, assessments, insurance, and other charges, if any, as shall be just and equitable”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.