Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 187 F.2d 514 - Calderon v. Tobin

Calderon v. Tobin’s Empirical Analysis

187 F.2d 514 · 1951

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
July 2002
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently July 2002 · most notably Czerkies v. U.S. Department of Labor (1996), Mitchell v. Jaffe (1958)

22 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

200195119601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 38 U.S.C. § 705

Relies on Van Horne v. Hines · United States ex rel. Eng Fon Sing v. Uhl · Barnett v. Hines · Dodd v. Aetna Life Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The action of the Secretary or his designees in allowing or denying any payment under sections 751-791 and 793 of this title shall be final and conclusive for all purposes and with respect to all questions of law and fact, and not subject to review by any other official of the United States, or by any court by mandamus or otherwise, * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The federal employees’ compensation allowances are grants by the Congress, and the agents of the Congress have power to determine the recipients of such grants. If Congress chose to preclude judicial review of the selection of the objects of its bounty, it could do so.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.