Chapman v. Sweeney

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Feb. 5, 1951.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1951-02-05

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 1951

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1951-02-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 *533H. M. Rust, Mansfield, Ohio, for appellant.

¶2Gertrude Bauer, Frank T. Cullitan and John Mahon, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee.

¶3Before MARTIN, McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5This appeal has been heard and considered upon the record and the briefs and oral arguments of the attorneys for the appellant and the United States respectively, from all of which it appears that the United States District Court correctly ruled that the appellant who seeks relief on habeas corpus application to a federal court has not exhausted the pursuance of his remedies in the state courts of Ohio.

¶6The order dismissing the petition for habeas corpus is affirmed.