Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 187 F.2d 615 - United States ex rel. Auld v. Warden of New Jersey State Penitentiary

United States ex rel. Auld v. Warden of New Jersey State Penitentiary’s Empirical Analysis

187 F.2d 615 · 1951

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
2
states following
November 2013
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 6 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently November 2013 · most notably United States ex rel. Darcy v. Handy (1953), United States ex rel. Almeida v. Baldi (1952)

22 federal appellate · 6 district · 4 state decisions

2201951196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Snyder v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · Mooney v. Holohan · Wolf v. People of the State of Colorado · Darr v. Burford · Ex Parte Hawk No - on Rule to Show Cause and Return

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An application for a writ of habeas corpus in behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court shall not be granted unless it appears that the applicant has exhausted the remedies available in the courts of the State * * *.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “This new section is declaratory of existing law as affirmed by the Supreme Court. See Ex parte Hawk, 1944, 321 U.S. 114 , 64 S.Ct. 448, 88 L.Ed. 572.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “`* * * judicial power to dismiss a petition on its merits is not destroyed by the statutory limitation on the granting of affirmative relief.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.