← 187 F.2d 65 - Packard Motor Car Co. v. Gem Mfg. Co.

Packard Motor Car Co. v. Gem Mfg. Co.’s Empirical Analysis

187 F.2d 65 · 1950

Citation profile

cited by 31 later decisions

January 1976

most recently cited

29 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently January 1976 · most notably Chappell & Co. v. Frankel (1966), United States v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad (1959)

29 federal appellate ·

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201

Relies on Winsor v. Daumit · Cutting Room Appliances Corp. v. Empire Cutting Machine Co. · Etten v. Kauffman · Raylite Electric Corp. v. Noma Electric Corp. · Kam Koon Wan v. E. E. Black, Ltd.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“The courts of appeals shall have jurisdiction of appeals from: "(1) Interlocutory orders of the district courts of the United States, * * * granting, continuing, modifying, refusing or dissolving injunctions, or refusing to dissolve or modify injunctions, except where a direct review may be had in the Supreme Court; "(2) Interlocutory orders appointing receivers, or refusing orders to wind up receiverships or to take steps to accomplish the purposes thereof, such as directing sales or other disposals of property; "(3) Interlocutory decrees of such district courts or the judges thereof determining the rights and liabilities of the parties to admiralty cases in which appeals from final decrees are allowed; "(4) Judgments in civil actions for patent infringement which are final except for accounting.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. American Mortgage Corporation v. First National Mortgage Company, a Corporation, Joseph Stein, and Leonard B. Stallman, and Harris Trust and Savings Bank, Capitol Bank of Chicago, and United of America Bank, Garnishee-Defendants. Leonard B. Stallman, Counter-Plaintiff v. American Mortgage Corporation, Counter-Defendant

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.