Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 187 F.2d 786 - Emerick v. Lambert

Emerick v. Lambert’s Empirical Analysis

187 F.2d 786 · 1951

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
September 1998
most recently cited

17 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently September 1998

17 federal appellate ·

16019511960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schoenamsgruber v. Hamburg American Line · The Maria · Stark v. Texas Co. · Postal S. S. Co. v. International Freighting Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “interlocutory decrees of such district courts or the judges thereof determining the rights and liabilities of the parties to admiralty cases in which appeals from final decrees are allowed”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It is clear enough that all the orders appealed from were preliminary steps to bring both actions to final issue and determination”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.