United States v. Klein’s Empirical Analysis
187 F.2d 873 · 1951
Citation profile
23 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently July 2011
23 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2
Relies on United States v. Atkinson · Alford v. United States · Ewing v. United States · United States v. Raub
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is hypercritical to say that because, in discussing testimony and its effect, a district attorney used the words ‘I know’ [and we may add ‘I think’], he is thereby testifying on behalf of the prosecution. * * * ””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.