Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 187 F.3d 317 - Whiting v. Lacara

Whiting v. Lacara’s Empirical Analysis

187 F.3d 317 · 1999

Citation profile

80
cited by 80 later decisions
2
states following
June 2020
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 8 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently June 2020 · most notably Mastercard International Inc. v. Visa International Service Ass'n (2006), Securities and Exchange Commission v. Thestreetcom Intervenor

28 federal appellate · 8 district · 3 state decisions

5101999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mitchell v. Forsyth · Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay · Abney v. United States · Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Risjord · Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller Ex Rel. Koller

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “effectively unreviewable on appeal from a final judgment.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In addressing motions to withdraw as counsel, district courts have typically considered whether 'the prosecution of the suit is [likely to be] disrupted by the withdrawal of counsel.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a narrow exception to the general rule that interlocutory orders are not appealable as a matter of right,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.