Thomas Reinbold Joan Reinbold Alexandra Reinbold’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
11 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably Pettiford v. City of Greensboro (2008), United States ex rel. Ackley v. International Business Machines Corp. (2000)
11 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · Wilson v. Garcia · United States v. Kubrick · Associated Grocers, Inc. v. Washington
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the district court denies a prevailing party's motion for attorneys' fees, we review such denial for abuse of discretion. However, if the district court determines, as a matter of law, that a party is not a prevailing party, we review the district court's determination de novo.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the Privacy Act does not allow a court to alter records that accurately reflect an administrative decision, nor the opinions behind that administrative decision, no matter how contestable the conclusions may be. An individual who is unhappy with the opinions filed in his records can obtain relief by placing a concise statement in his records which sets forth his disagreement with the opinions contained therein.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“reasonably necessary and substantially caused the requested [ relief, ] ... [ despite ] the absence of a final judgment in his favor [.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.