Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 187 F.3d 829 - Peter v. Jax

Peter v. Jax’s Empirical Analysis

187 F.3d 829 · 1999

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
January 2015
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently January 2015 · most notably Vaughn v. Principi (2003), POPP Telcom v. American Sharecom, Inc. (2000)

12 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

210199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Farrar v. Hobby · Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc. · City of Boerne v. Flores · Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School District

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “requires nothing less than the hypothetical relitigation of cases which, because of [an intervening event], need not be litigated at all.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “fee disputes to `spawn a second litigation of significant dimension.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “actual relief on the merits of his claim [that] materially alters the legal relationship between the parties by modifying the defendant's behavior in a way that directly benefits the plaintiff”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.