¶1 Osborne Wynn, Jr., appeals the magistrate judge’s order * dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action for failure to *285 state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See Wynn v. Johnson, No. CA-04-827 (E.D.Va. Oct. 24, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
¶2 AFFIRMED
*
¶3 The case was decided by a magistrate judge with the consent of the parties. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).