Faison v. Colvin’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Butler v. Barnhart · Marcus v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U. S. Department of Labor · Smith v. Bowen · Dickey v. Office of Personnel Management
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“additional hearings would serve no purpose other than to delay the inevitable receipt of benefits”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kenner v. Berryhill
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.