Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 187 ILL 310 - Frail v. Carstairs

Frail v. Carstairs’s Empirical Analysis

1900

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
February 1934
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 1934

8 state decisions

401900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Peters v. Balke

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If either James, Kate or Margaret Frail shall die unmarried their share shall go to the survivor or survivors of them; and it is my further will that at the death of all these parties named in this article dying unmarried their interests shall all go to my son Thomas Frail, his heirs and assigns forever.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.