Curry v. Kline’s Empirical Analysis
1960
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
April 1979
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Adams v. Main · Powers v. Sumbler · Roberts v. Dockstader
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) The defendant must have exercised improper, willful, and malicious influence on [plaintiff’s] spouse in derogation of the plaintiff’s marital rights. (2) The [plaintiff’s] spouse must not have voluntarily accepted defendant’s advances at the outset of the affair. (3) The [plaintiff’s] spouse must not have actively contributed to the procuration by intentionally seeking the companionship and the affection of the defendant. (4) The plaintiff must prove he or she was not at fault in causing the other spouse’s affections to stray. (5) The willful and malicious influence of the defendant on the [plaintiff’s] spouse must be proven as the procuring cause of the loss of the love and affection which the [plaintiff’s] spouse formerly held for the plaintiff. (Emphasis omitted.)”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Long v. Fischer · Wilson v. Aylward
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.