State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1960
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
December 1972
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Lowry · Bateman v. Roller · Pugh v. City of Topeka · Halverson v. Blosser · Fralick v. Kansas City Public Service Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““On motion for new trial after a verdict of guilty in a criminal case, the trial court has the duty of using its best judicial discretion in determining whether it will approve the verdict or grant a new trial, regardless of any error to which objection was made at the trial. “In reviewing the order of a trial court on motion for new trial the supreme court has no discretion and must find clear error before reversing the order of the trial court on the motion.” (Syl. ff 1,2.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Kimmel““All parties were fully cognizant of the decision of this court in State v. Lowry, 163 Kan. 622 , 185 P. 2d 147 , holding lie detector tests to be incompetent evidence.” (p. 44.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Emory
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.