Hoch v. Hoch’s Empirical Analysis
1961
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 district · 22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently December 2014 · most notably In the Interest of B.D.-Y. (2008), In Re Bd-Y. (2008)
6 federal appellate · 2 district · 22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Petty v. Petty · Lambert v. Rhea · Perkins v. Perkins · Jones v. Coate · Shaffer v. Shaffer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . one who asserts fraud must prove it by a preponderance of the evidence; . . . such evidence should be clear, convincing and satisfactory, and ... it does not devolve upon the party charged with committing the fraud to prove tire transaction was honest and bona fide. Fraud is never presumed; it must be proved. Mere suspicion is not sufficient.” (p. 732.)”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[s]ubsequently . . . signed his entry of appearance in the divorce action”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.