Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 187 Kan. 74 - Carter v. Carter

Carter v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
3
states following
May 1994
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 1994

10 state decisions

401960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wright v. Rogers · Jardon v. Price · Meech v. Grigsby · Cole v. Coons · Cockrill v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A witness may réfresh his recollection by reference to any memoranda relating to the subject-matter, to which his attention is directed on the stand, whether the memoranda are in such form as to be competent as independent evidence or not, and then testify, providing he then has any independent recollection of such subject-matter.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.