Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 187 La. 507 - Long v. Chailan

Long v. Chailan’s Empirical Analysis

1937

Citation profile

82
cited by 82 later decisions
1
states following
April 2012
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 74 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 82 later decisions — most recently April 2012 · most notably Blevins v. Manufacturers Record Publishing Co. (1958), Snelling v. Adair (1940)

4 federal appellate · 74 state decisions

280193719401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McDuffie v. Walker · Castillo v. McConnico · Succession of Todd · Bender v. Chew · Charbonnet v. State Realty Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““As to the long silence and delay in the bringing of this suit, especially on the part of the two plaintiffs who were not plaintiffs in the former suits, it was said in Pearce v. Ford, 124 La. 851 , 50 So. 771 , that mere silence and delay could not cause a loss of title to property except by effect of the laws of prescription. In Charbonnet v. State Realty Co., 155 La. 1044 , 99 So. 865 , it was held that a judgment dismissing a suit on the ground of abandonment, for a neglect to prosecute the suit for five years, under the provisions of article 3519 of the Revised Civil Code of 1870, as amended by Act No. 107 of 1898, was not a basis for a plea of estoppel or res judicata. * * *””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.