Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 187 La. 987 - Williams v. Fredericks

Williams v. Fredericks’s Empirical Analysis

1937

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
December 1976
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently December 1976

9 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

8019371940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on West v. Camden · Manson v. . Curtis · Realty Acceptance Corp. v. Montgomery · Thomas v. Matthews · Rogers v. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The directors of a corporation occupy a fiduciary relation to the stockholders generally, not only to the stockholders who elect them, but to all of the stockholders; and this fiduciary relation to the stockholders forbids a director to bind himself to use his official authority or prerogative for the personal benefit of any one. The leading case on the subject is West v. Camden, 135 U.S. 507 , 10 S.Ct. 838, 34 L.Ed. 254, where the doctrine is stated thus: * * *.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.