Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 187 Md. 241 - Sezzin v. Stark

Sezzin v. Stark’s Empirical Analysis

1946

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
3
states following
November 2019
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently November 2019 · most notably Langley Park Apartments, SEC. H., Inc. v. Lund (1964), Waltzinger v. Birsner (1975)

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 38 state decisions

15019461950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Thompson v. Thompson · Jessie Thompson v. Charles N Thompson · Texas Pacific Railway Company v. Emma Humble · Merrifield v. C. Hoffberger Co. · Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Tice

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"A possessor of land who leases a part thereof and retains in his own control any other part which the lessee is entitled to use as appurtenant to the part leased to him, is subject to liability to his lessee and others lawfully upon the land with the consent of the lessee or a sublessee for physical harm caused by a dangerous condition upon that part of the land retained in the lessor’s control, if the lessor by the exercise of reasonable care could have discovered the condition and the unreasonable risk involved therein and could have made the condition safe.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““ ‘ “[Where ] the construction of tenement or apartment houses, intended for the habitation of many tenants, ... which situations differ[ed] entirely from any comprehended by the rural conditions of habitations at the common law, the courts have found it necessary to recognize the novel housing requisite incident to modern life, by treating hallways and stairs as common ways or appurtenances, kept and maintained by the landlord, for the purpose of affording reasonable entrances and exits to and from the demised premises; and for a failure to reasonably maintain which, in the event of damage to occupants and others lawfully using the premises, the landlord has by the general trend of authority been made liable.” ’ (Italics supplied here).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.