187 Mich. App. 90 - People v. Jemison’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 2009
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To "cause access to be made" to a computer requires more than merely supplying information which ultimately finds its way into a computer system in the normal course of business. We do not believe, on the basis of the language of the statute, that the provision is all encompassing. The computer must serve as the device by which the fraud is perpetrated, and the defendant must participate in the access of the computer as that term is defined by the statute. Here, the computer merely played an incidental role in processing [Department] paperwork.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Robb“'Access' means to approach, instruct, communicate with, store data in, retrieve [or intercept] data from, or otherwise use the resources of, a computer, computer system, or computer network.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Robb“within the purview of the computer fraud statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Robb
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.