Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 187 Minn. 176 - State Ex Rel. Herniman v. Markson

State Ex Rel. Herniman v. Markson’s Empirical Analysis

1932

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
August 2002
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently August 2002

11 state decisions

4019321940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State ex rel. Platzer v. Beardsley · State ex rel. Flint v. Flint · State ex rel. Lehman v. Martin · State Ex Rel. Feeley v. Williams · Gauthier v. Walter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The grandparents must accept the inevitable. They will make their own sorrow and that of their grandson less if they accept the situation gracefully with a realization that they have done an appreciated good service for the boy just as have many good grandparents before them. The boy will soon accommodate himself to his changed surroundings. He can be in communication with his grandparents. “All realize that the grandparents’ custody must terminate before many years. It is best that the change come now.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““* * * The law which gives a parent a natural and enforceable right to his child, and deprives him of it only when the best interests of the child demand, appreciates that the call of blood relationship is a promise of right treatment not to be disregarded.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.