Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

187 Misc. 357

Coyne v. Silvers

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · decided 1946-05-28

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 1949

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1946-05-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Memorandum

Per Curiam.

¶2The fact that the landlord desires to engageoin a business similar to that conducted by the tenant does not deprive him of his right to secure possession of the premises where, as in the instant case, he establishes his good faith in seeking such possession for his immediate hnd personal use.

¶3The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and final order directed for landlord as prayed for in petition, with costs.

¶4Eder and Hecht, JJ., concur in memorandum Per Curiam; Hammer, J., dissents in the following memorandum: I dissent and vote for affirmance.

¶5Order reversed, etc.

/187/misc/357 · .json · Public domain