Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 187 Mont. 74 - State v. Rose

State v. Rose’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
1
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

45 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently November 2025 · most notably State v. Boyer (1985), Vernon Kills on Top v. State (1996)

45 state decisions

39019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Aguilar v. Texas · McMann v. Richardson · Wardius v. Oregon · Roberts v. Florida · Cooper v. Fitzharris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Persons accused of crime are entitled to the effective assistance of counsel acting within the range of competence demanded of attorneys in criminal cases.” State v. Rose, 608 P.2d at 1081 .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““ ‘Persons accused of crime are entitled to the effective assistance of counsel acting within the range of competence demanded of attorneys in criminal cases.’ ” State v. Rose (1980), Mont., 608 P.2d at 1081 , 37 St.Rep. at 649-650; Fitzpatrick v. State (1981), Mont., 638 P.2d 1002, 1007 , 38 St.Rep. 1448 , 1451; Cooper v. Fitzharris (9th Cir.1978) 586 F.2d 1325, 1330 . “ ‘Claimed inadequacy of counsel must not be tested by a greater sophistication of appellate counsel, nor by that counsel’s unrivaled opportunity to study the record at leisure and cite different tactics of perhaps doubtful efficacy. Success is not a test of efficient counsel, frequently neither vigor, zeal, nor skill can overcome the truth.’ ” State v. Rose, 608 P.2d at 1082 , 37 St.Rep. at 652; State v. Forsness (1972), 159 Mont. 105, 110 , 495 P.2d 176, 178-179 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““Where the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel rests upon specific acts and omissions of counsel at trial, as it does in this case, relief will be granted only if it appears that the defendant was prejudiced by counsel’s conduct.” State v. Rose, 608 P.2d 1081 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.