¶1The defendant, Vincent P. Melvin, and John G. Ryan, were convicted of burglary upon pleas of guilty. The charges arose out of an offense on May 14, 1971, in which both men participated.
¶2The defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for 1 to 2 years. Ryan was sentenced to imprisonment for 1 year. The defendant appeals, claiming that his sentence was excessive and should not have exceeded that imposed on Ryan.
¶3In passing sentence, it is proper for the trial court to take into consideration other offenses that have been committed by the accused. In this case, the defendant’s record of previous offenses justifies a more severe sentence than that imposed on Ryan.
¶4Ryan had been fined for disorderly conduct, disturbing the peace, petit larceny, speeding on two occasions, and driving without an operator’s license. On March 4, 1971, he had been placed on 6 months’ probation for *798breaking and entering an automobile.
¶5The defendant had been charged with writing insufficient fund checks on three occasions and had been sentenced to jail on two occasions for periods of 7 days and 30 days. In January 1971, he was sentenced to jail for 4 months for burglary and placed on probation for 1 year for destruction of property. Apparently, the present offense was committed only a short time after he had been released from jail on the previous burglary charge.
¶6The record does not show an' abuse of discretion. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
¶7Affirmed.