Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 187 N.J. 119 - State v. Thomas

State v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
2
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 34 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Blakely v. Washington · State v. MacOn · State v. Natale · Ryan v. Powell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The court shall not charge the jury with respect to an included offense unless there is a rational basis for a verdict convicting the defendant of the included offense.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) It is established by proof of the same or less than all the facts required to establish the commission of the offense charged; or . . . . (3) It differs from the offense charged only in the respect that a less serious injury or risk of injury to the same person . . . or a lesser kind of culpability suffices to establish its commission. [ N.J.S.A. 2C:1-8d.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the requested charge satisf[ies] the definition of an included offense set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:1-8d, and (2) . . . there [is] a rational basis in the evidence to support a charge on that included offense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.