State v. Molina’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently January 2022
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Teague v. Lane · Boddie v. Connecticut · United States v. Robinson · Morningstar v. United States · State v. Lark
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[A] case announces a new rule when it breaks new ground or imposes a new obligation on the State[.]'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[I]f a defendant has not been advised of his right to appeal as provided under R. 3:21-4(h), he is entitled to as within time relief provided the sentencing transcript confirms that he was not advised of his right to appeal under the Rule, and his application for leave to appeal as within time is filed no later than five years from the date of his sentencing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“whether the rule we announce today `is to be applied retroactively and, if so, to what extent, a determination that implicates a three-step analysis.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. JG
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.