187 So. 2d 28 - Allred v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 2018
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Gideon v. Wainwright · Escobedo v. Illinois · Jackson v. Denno · Fay v. Noia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In the instant case, after the trial judge had heard the testimony, he not only released the prisoner on bail, as is permitted in habeas corpus proceedings, (Miss.Code Ann. § 2831, 1956), but he granted a new trial to the petitioner in the circuit court, which is not done on a hearing in a habeas corpus proceeding, but which is a duty to be performed by a trial judge in a hearing for a writ of error coram nobis to set aside or correct a sentence, or grant a new trial. Re: Broom’s Petition, 251 Miss. 25 , 168 So.2d 44 (1964). We will therefore consider the acts and judgment of the trial court as if the judge had proceeded upon a petition for a writ of error coram nobis. ( 187 So.2d at 32 .)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The mere fact that the defendant did not have an attorney until he was presented for arraignment does not mean that the court must release him. It simply means that where it is later discovered that some undue advantage was taken of the defendant before he had an attorney, he will be granted a new trial, and the evidence wrongfully obtained will not be permitted to be used against him. He will be furnished an attorney to represent him on a new trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“those pretrial procedures that would impair defense on the merits if the accused is required to proceed without counsel. (Citations omitted). ( 420 U.S. at 122 , 95 S.Ct. at 867 , 43 L.Ed.2d at 70 ). In Allred v. State, 187 So.2d 28 (Miss. 1966), we said that: Under the facts in this case, the first time an attorney was needed by the defendant was when he was presented for arraignment. The preliminary hearing was not such a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.