Osburn v. Stickel’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 2019
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 89 So. 2d 503 - Youngblood v. Taylor · Sodak Distributing Company v. Wayne · Smith v. Urquhart · 35 Cal. App. 2d 659 - Smith v. Schwartz · 101 So. 2d 166 - Kokotoff v. Higman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although the term 'privity' has no definition which can be applied uniformly, it is not completely elusive, but denotes a mutual or successive relationship to the same interest in property”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) Such evidence has at such former trial been reported stenographically or reduced to writing in the presence of the court; (2) That the party against whom the evidence is offered, or his privy, was a party on the former trial; (3) That the issue is substantially the same in both cases; (4) That a substantial reason is shown why the original witness or document is not produced; and (5) That the court is satisfied that the report of such evidence taken at such former trial is a correct report.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Privity does not arise from the mere fact that persons as litigants are interested in the same question or in proving or disproving the same state of facts. Privity within the meaning of the doctrine of res judicata is privity as it exists in relationship to the subject matter of the litigation, and the rule is construed strictly to mean parties claiming under the same title. It denotes mutual or successive relationship to the same right or property.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.