Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

187 So. 3d 369

Woodman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2016-03-18

Relies on Perez v. State

Decided 2016-03-18

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the trial court’s order reinstating and modifying Appellant’s probation following an open plea. However, because the written order on appeal does not set forth the specific condition of probation that was violated, we remand for the entry of a proper order that specifies the condition of probation violated. See Perez v. State, 958 So.2d 1076, 1076 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007).

¶2AFFIRMED; REMANDED for entry of proper order.

BERGER, LAMBERT, and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
/187/so3d/369 · .json · Public domain